Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< July 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From

An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!

Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."


Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch

Useful Links

Share your wish list with friends and family

Free online file transfer - even works with Android phones

Reviews of hotels, flights and sites
Convenient comparison shopping

Reading Material

The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics
Practical conservatism for the common man

Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World
Philly news and blogs

Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek

Articles Previously Published at

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04

Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
Rebel Rouser
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net

Locations of visitors to this page

Saturday, July 22, 2006
A Valid Veto on Fruitless Funding

Five and a half years after taking office, President Bush finally blew the dust off his veto pen to reject increased Federal funding for embryonic stem cell (ESC) research. There's no good, scientific reason the government should fund embryonic stem cell research (not to mention most other things), and many reasons not to do so.

Critics complain because he vetoed the bill due to his religious convictions, as though that's a bad thing. Liberals seem to believe no one who draws a government paycheck should have moral values, or should pretend they have none while on the job. Sometimes it seems they won't be satisfied until all officials are drawn from the 6 percent of Americans who have no religious or spiritual beliefs at all, while the 90 percent who do (according to a 2005 Newsweek/Beliefnet poll) are excluded from holding any government job. They just don't understand that the majority of Americans want a President who adheres to strong religious beliefs, as shown by a 2004 Zogby poll. While the Left tries to build a soulless, hidebound, all-encompassing bureaucratic machine reminiscent of the dear old Soviet Union, a republican form of government should be reflective of the people it governs.

The first reaction of Democrats and Liberals is to call the veto a "ban" on stem cell research, thinking to make it a campaign issue as they tried to do in 2004. That's two lies for the price of one. No research has been banned by Bush's veto on appropriating Federal funds for it. In fact, the Bush administration is the first to fund embryonic stem cell research at all, a fact those on the Left are disinclined to mention. In addition, there are other forms of stem cell research for which government funding has not been blocked.

The private sector (in which research and development used to take place) and state governments are free to fund ESC projects as much as they like. California, for instance, has appropriated three billion dollars for that purpose. Complaints about having to depend on private funding for ESC research only highlight the fact that years of such research have shown few positive results, and produced some spectacular failures. Embryonic stem cells introduced into laboratory mice are routinely rejected by the subject's immune system, and often result in teratomas -- Greek for "monster tumor" -- as the stem cells form all kinds of tissues unrelated to the surrounding tissue.

Meanwhile, research on adult stem cells found in bone marrow, the pancreas, the spleen, hair follicles and fat cells have all produced actual, measurable results. Stem cells taken from the placenta (afterbirth) and umbilical cord after live births show at least as much promise as cells from dead embryos. Dr. Mariusz Ratajczak of the University of Louisville (Kentucky) has directed adult bone marrow stem cells to change into brain, nerve, heart and pancreatic cells. In 2004, Dr. Dennis Turner testified before Congress that symptoms of his Parkinson's disease virtually vanished for four years after treatment with stem cells from his own brain. This research mimics all the supposedly miraculous properties of ESCs while overcoming the rejection issue.

Research on adult stem cells have shown remarkable progress in treating diabetes, muscular dystrophy, blindness, heart disease, paralysis, cancer and
dozens of other medical conditions. All ESC research proponents can talk about is potential breakthroughs, while adult stem cell research is actually producing the results. Aside from the lure of endless funding for projects that never need show a return, why do Liberals want taxpayer dollars funneled into experiments that have so far yielded no results?

The most common Liberal argument against Bush's veto is, "well, fertility clinics kill embryos anyway." Two wrongs, however, don't make a right. Deliberately killing fertilised, viable human embryos in the name of science would be a step towards "normalising" abortion for the general public, in anticipation of the possible overturn of Roe v. Wade. If the Supreme Court's unlegislated legalisation of abortion is overturned, individual states would once again get to decide the question of abortion's legality.

If killing human embryos for research purposes becomes widely accepted as a legitimate use of tax dollars, then the Liberal argument for government-funded abortion will be, "how is it any different from harvesting them for research, which we already pay for?" To Liberals, money means acceptance, even endorsement... which is why they fight against Federal funding for projects run by religious groups or charities.

Bush's veto of Federal funding for embryonic stem cell research was the right thing to do, morally and scientifically. If state governments and private firms want to sink money into ESC research based on promises that sound more like those of a faith healer than a scientist, let them answer to local voters and investors.

30 July 06 UPDATE: A company called BrainStorm is just one of several already treating Parkinson's Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease) and Multiple Sclerosis using stem cells taken from the patient's own bone marrow. If anyone has a good reason why we should funnel taxpayer dollars into research that will take decades to reach the same point, if it ever does, while using material which is at best morally ambiguous, I have yet to hear it.

Posted at Saturday, July 22, 2006 by CavalierX

July 24, 2006   10:02 AM PDT
Thanks for the education, Cav! I had no idea that ESC wasn't working as well as its proponents wish for (something I disagree with on a moral basis) and also that so much progress has been made with other stem cells!

Leave a Comment:


Homepage (optional)


Previous Entry Home Next Entry